Is summer gay in time cut
Who "E" Really Is & What Their Letter To Summer Means In Occasion Cut
WARNING! This article contains SPOILERS for Time Chop ()!Lucy finds out that she’s mistaken about the real identity of “E” in the letter that she found to Summer, leading to a major realization about her sister in Time Cut. In , Time Cut’s main character Lucy explains that she feels her life has always been impacted by the death of her sister, Summer, who was tragically murdered about three years before she was even born in Since they never met, Lucy initially only knows about Summer through her parents’ memories and what’s left in her aged room, which includes a mysterious letter addressed to her from “E.”
When Lucy accidentally travels back in time two days before Summer’s murder in , she finally gets to learn the truth about who her sister was, which helps her to piece together who really wrote the letter. The letter simply states, “Summer. Now I’m free but you’ll never be. You’ll regret this. – E.” Originally, Lucy thought that “E,” stood for Summer’s ex-boyfriend Ethan, whom their parents believed w
Time Cut
This teen horror slasher is maybe a decade too late to be original, even with the time travel gimmick. Unfortunately, there isn't anything about Time Cut that hasn't been done before and much better. The characters are at least likeable and acted well, even though they are a little generic. Lucy is smart and has been accepted into a NASA program in the show , while Summer isn't adj but is super well-liked. There is your stereotypical "nerdy" teen boy, side characters who quickly perish, and a serial killer on the loose who could be anyone. While the presentation and art direction try to capture nostalgia, steeping characters in clothing from the moment period, pumping malls and parties with pop hits from the early s and highlighting technology verb portable CD players and early flip cellphones, the gimmick quickly starts to feel like diminishing returns. But a few viewers may get a thrust out of it.
The main problems with this film have to with unoriginality, predictability, and a prolonged list of logical gaps, plot holes, and absurdities. For one, no one seems to care that an
Netflixs new movie Time Cut has familiar faces, a slasher mystery, humor, second travel, sisterly bonding, enough early s nostalgia to fill a shopping mall, and, the reason Im here to talk to you today, lesbians!
Time journey slasher comedy? I listen you asking. Didnt I see that movie last year? Well, friends, recollect how in the movies Friends with Benefits and No Strings Attached came out in the matching year, and were basically the same movie but one had Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis and the other had Ashton Kutcher and Natalie Portman? Thats basically what happened here with Time Cut and last years period travel slasher, Totally Killer. But where in Totally Killer, the main character went back to the 80s (a perfectly respectable decade for time travel) to try to catch the person who slew her mothers friends, in Time Cut, the main character travels to , because apparently that was 20 entire years ago. (Rude.) And while the elevator pitches for these movies are very similar, the actual plot and how things play out is a bit distinct. (And tec
Time Cut Review: Netflix's Impoverished Excuse For A Slasher Should’ve Followed Its Dramatic Instincts
Time Cut is a frustrating film, twice over. On the one hand, it takes a genre conceit that should be a layup and sleepwalks right through it, in a way that implies the audience deserves no effort beyond what it took to get them to press play. As if those who passion slashers or time-travel movies are won over by premises alone, not the passion and creativity of their execution. Certain scenes left me feeling more insulted than disappointed.
Time Cut
Madison Bailey
Lucy Field
On the other hand, there is another, better movie buried within Time Cut that occasionally peeks through, and that I so desperately wanted to be watching. You never want to be left envisioning an alternate path for something you just finished, so transparent to you that it becomes aggravating to assume about what the film actually was. Still, I admire it for provoking the questions that it does, and I'm still trying to grapple with the cognitive dissonance of that. I apologize if, in trying